Despite emergency planners using worst-case scenarios and high-impact, low-frequency events when
planning for disasters, experiencing an event in real time exposes gaps in those plans that were not
foreseeable (or at least not included in the plan). Furthermore, as time goes on, resources and other
needs naturally change. In order to meet today’s disaster support needs, continuous planning,
reevaluating, and updating are necessary in order to minimize the impact of any disaster.
The COVID-19 pandemic has raised many discussions on the topic of acceptable losses. For community decision makers, this is a difficult yet necessary issue to consider before making decisions that may have life-threatening consequences. Spurred by two articles and followed up with a nationwide survey and report, this podcast was presented at the National Homeland Security Association’s virtual conference in July and is now available as a rebroadcast of commentary by leading healthcare experts.
The COVID-19 pandemic has raised many discussions on the topic of acceptable losses. For community decision makers, this is a difficult yet necessary issue to consider before making decisions that may have life-threatening consequences. Spurred by two articles and followed up with a nationwide survey and report, this podcast was presented at the National Homeland Security Association’s virtual conference in July and is now available as a rebroadcast of commentary by leading healthcare experts.
All disasters are innately different, so no two responses can be identical. If no two responses are
identical, then no single plan can be perfect for any specific disaster. And that is okay. Successful
disaster management is about implementing the most relevant plan, finding the most reliable information
available, and making the best decisions based on that information and accessible resources. This August
edition of the DomPrep Journal presents four imperfect yet critical components of disaster response:
models, disaster case management, contact tracing, and citizen response.
While much of the news media has been focused on the coronavirus pandemic, violent incidents
continue to occur throughout the United States. The shutdown of sporting events, schools, concerts, and
other large events has led to an overall decrease in active shooter incidents. In fact, March 2020 was
the first March without a school shooting since 2002.
An important aspect of emergency preparedness is a robust exercise program designed with the vital
purpose of identifying gaps, updating plans, and strengthening emergency response. Exercises bring
together key stakeholders to help build collaborative relationships that pay huge dividends when the
real emergency arises. Simply understanding other agency protocols and operational capabilities are
valuable lessons learned from most exercises. However, exercises go beyond the checklists, plans, and
policies. They offer the opportunity to get to know other people and solidify teams.
Many professions are steeped in tradition, including those in emergency preparedness and response
organizations. In these well-established environments, when asked to make a change to traditional
practices, the response is sometimes simply, “No, this is how we’ve always done it.” Such thinking can
leave communities underprepared for new, emerging, or evolving threats. What worked well 5, 10, or 20
years ago may have lost its effectiveness as times and conditions have changed or there may simply be
more options available that have not been considered because of tradition.
The concept of a whole community approach has been recommended for years. However, it has perhaps
not been more important than it is today. Compounding events, or disasters within disasters, are why
emergency planners stress the importance of planning for the worst but hoping for the best. Well, the
time to implement these plans is now. The ongoing COVID-19 pandemic does not appear to be ending anytime
soon. However, life must go on. “Normal” seasonal disasters like wildfires, hurricanes, earthquakes, and
floods will not wait for communities to replenish supplies, reallocate resources, and hire more staff.
Human-caused threats may escalate as bad actors take advantage of physical and technological
vulnerabilities that the pandemic exposes. The common primary, secondary, and tertiary effects of
smaller threats worsen when compounded with the pandemic response.
One of the biggest challenges that emergency preparedness professionals face is how to balance the
choices they make. Mitigating every risk is not realistic, but ignoring threats is reprehensible.
Lessons learned from any disaster exposes the successes and failures of those tasked with keeping their
communities safe. Some decisions have immediate impact, whereas the consequences of other decisions may
not be seen until sometime in the future. In both cases, people are watching and decision makers will be
held accountable.
The COVID-19 pandemic takes its toll in terms of human lives and global economic consequences.
Social distancing has proven to be the most promising strategy against emerging viruses without borders,
but the heavy economic damage that follows puts in question the possibility of its continuation. In
fact, weighing the two elements raises an important debate: What is the acceptable loss in order to win
this battle?