As a hurricane approaches, a leader must decide whether to issue an order to evacuate or to shelter
in place. When creating active shooter plans, school officials must determine what information can and
should be shared to mitigate the threat. To mitigate disaster, each community must consider the unique
risks and threats that it faces. As emergency preparedness professionals age, they must engage youths to
ensure future resilience. This edition of the DomPrep Journal highlights four key force multipliers for
promoting public safety: information sharing, crisis leadership, situational awareness, and youth
engagement.
On 2 January 2019, the Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School Public Safety Commission (MSDHSPSC) released its initial report. The commission report addressed many critical issues and lessons learned within its 15 chapters. The chapter on information sharing discussed the actual or perceived restrictions from privacy laws such as the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA). The discussion addressed several areas where there is significant confusion and dispute that continues until today, and directly impacts safety and security planning, preparedness, and collaboration.
Emergency management is a dynamic field filled with numerous personalities managing ever-changing environments. Some emergency managers handle disastrous events on a yearly basis compared with others who go their entire careers without facing a single disaster. They maneuver unique political landscapes, manage robust emergency management offices, or work in offices of one. In any setting, one of the critical tools found within the emergency manager’s toolbox is maintaining situational awareness.
A healthy community is a resilient community. From pandemic threats to school shootings, crisis
events continue to affect the health and wellbeing of the surrounding human population long after the
crisis ends. These health effects can then weaken a community’s ability to cope with future disasters.
As such, physical, psychological, environmental, and technological factors all play key roles in
determining how well a community prepares for, mitigates, responds to, and recovers from a disaster.
Conventional acts of terrorism will likely never fade away, and advancements in technology will continually raise concerns for governments and global security practitioners. The increasing threat and possibility of chemical, biological, radiological, nuclear, and explosive (CBRNE) use is evolving. Terrorist groups are actively seeking materials and the expertise to manufacture and utilize those materials in future operations. One of the frontiers in terrorism today involves a developing technology known as “gene drives.”
Nutrition, community resilience, and poverty are just a few factors that are of great importance to public health professionals, which include representatives for maternal and child health, preparedness, nutrition, epidemiology, and land use planning, among others. However, the second largest segment of the public health workforce – the environmental health (EH) profession – bridges the gaps within the public health discipline as well as between public health and other disciplinary sectors.
On 6-8 November 2018, global health leaders from around the globe met in Bali, Indonesia, for the 5th Global Health Security Agenda (GHSA) Ministerial Meeting. At the meeting, the GHSA launched a five-year plan to address health security issues called GHSA 2024 and U.S. Health and Human Services Deputy Secretary Eric Hargan reaffirmed U.S. support for the GHSA with a pledge of $150 million. This global efforts and this commitment of resources to strengthen the capacity to prevent, detect, and respond to infectious diseases are clearly needed.
Food is essential to life. Its production, distribution, and consumption present unique – and increasingly urgent – economic and public health challenges. Roughly 50% of the world’s assets, 50% of global employment, and 50% of consumer expenditures are related to the food system. Closer to home, the second and third largest employers in the United States are in the food industry. About one-third of Americans eat at least one meal away from home each day. Anticipation, evaluation, and control of food-related infections and contamination are essential functions provided by the governmental public health system.
In 2014, the United States was directly exposed to the Ebola virus, which was at that time
relatively unknown on domestic soil. The nation was underprepared to manage the public relations issues
associated with this scenario. Since that time, roundtables have been conducted, responder trainings
have been created, and information has been disseminated to better prepare responders and inform the
public. However, there is a delicate balance when informing the public of potential threats: provide
enough information to mitigate new exposure risks, but do not overhype the threat.
When faced with cases of highly infectious diseases, emergency responders and medical receivers need to know how to protect themselves and prevent the disease from spreading to others. One training facility is focusing on this topic with courses that instruct healthcare workers and other responders about infection-control barrier guidelines and isolation protocols.